With the first round of the NBA playoffs nearing its halfway point, much has played out according to pre-playoff expectations, and that’s been good news for the better-seeded team in each series. Six of eight matchups have had double-digit average per-game victory margins; hell, the San Antonio Spurs have thumped the Memphis Grizzlies by an average of 29 points per game. It’s a massacre out there.But not everything has followed that pattern. Using our Elo ratings (which measure a team’s strength at a given moment), we found the teams that have exceeded their regular-season expectations the most since the playoffs tipped off last weekend. And even given the lack of first-round surprises so far, some teams have managed to raise eyebrows with their play, as we highlight in the video below:Chief among those teams: the Miami Heat, who are, um, torching [One of you owes me 20 push-ups. — Ed.] the Charlotte Hornets in their series thus far. Although our model expected Miami to win by 3.9 points per game, the Heat have prevailed by an average margin of 22 a game. With guys like Hassan Whiteside and Justise Winslow in the mix, you might think the Heat’s defense — stingy during the regular season — is behind this run. But no, it’s an unstoppable offense that’s driving the Heat’s blowouts.That Heat attack is averaging 1.24 points per play, according to Synergy Sports Technology; that’s the best of any team in the playoffs. According to data from the NBA’s player-tracking SportVU tech, Miami’s pick-and-roll performance has jumped from 91.1 points per 100 chances created by those plays during the regular season to 121.8 per 100 chances in the playoffs. Luol Deng is hitting 55 percent of his 3-pointers; Whiteside is shooting 88 percent around the rim; and Dwyane Wade is scoring 22 points per game with an assortment of crafty, old-man moves.Josh Richardson is perhaps most emblematic of the Heat getting, well, hot [Forty. — Ed.]. The rookie averaged only 21 minutes over 52 games this regular season, but he’s second on the Heat in minutes during the playoffs and, according to Synergy, is tied for the league lead in spot-up attempts — and leads outright in makes.As a team, the Heat are shooting out of their minds. So on to the natural question: Can this last? According to SportVU data that estimates shot difficulty using variables such as location, shot distance and the defender’s proximity, the Heat are taking extremely difficult shots — their playoff shot selection is of a similar difficulty to the Minnesota Timberwolves’ during the regular season, which was third-worst in the league. The difference is, their effective field goal percentage on those shots is 14.2 percentage points higher than you’d expect, given the types of shots they’re taking. (For reference, no team finished the regular season more than 4.1 percentage points better than expectation.)But although the Heat will probably cool off [I’ll just let you know when you can stop. — Ed.] before their series against Charlotte is over, our predictions now list them as 82 percent favorites to advance into the second round. If Miami gets there, a matchup against Toronto — which has underperformed its own expectations in the first round — seems likely, so we might even get to witness a fun experiment in whether “momentum” can carry over from one round to the next.Check out FiveThirtyEight’s 2016 NBA Playoff Predictions.
Earlier this week wrestling fans rushed to the Demba Diop Stadium in Senegal to see the monumental match up between Yahya Diop (Yekini) and Omar Sakho (Balla Gaye 2). The event didn’t start until seven in the afternoon but at nine in the morning fans were already camped outside the stadium. Laamb wrestling has become even more popular than soccer in Senegal, according to Magatte Diop, the director of sponsorship at Sonatel, Orange’s Senegalese subsidiary.Despite the massive size of the two combatants, the two wrestlers gracefully performed the “dance of champions” as drums and musical odes welcomed them into the arena. The dance was meant to repel black magic from the wrestlers before they stepped foot into the ring. Their “uniforms” consisted of magical talismans called gris-gris and before the match both men poured a protective bath all over their bodies. According Mbaye Gueye Dieng, a spiritual guide or marabout in the mystical Sufi tradition, “The gris-gris and baths are just for protection against negative tongues and eyes.” Despite all the physical training that goes on in order to get the wrestlers prepared for the big matches, many spectators believe that the spirits are the ones who determine the winner.“The most important preparations are made in the home of the marabout,” Dieng added.In order to be victorious in laamb, the wrestler has to get his opponent’s head, back, or both hands and knees to the ground. Only certain matches of laamb allow for punches, and these matches often gain the most publicity.Malick Thiandom, a sports broadcaster for Senegalese Radio and Television, said, “We used to wrestle for the honor of the village. Today…with the sponsors who inject lots of money to have visibility, it has become a breadwinner for lots of wrestlers.” Orange has become a major sponsor for the Senegalese sport. The most successful laamb wrestlers earn more than $100,000 per match, but the odds of most wrestlers gaining this much success are slim. Thiandoum admitted that he is constantly telling the youth not to pursue this sport in an attempt to gain financial success because there is a “gap” between what they believe and reality. Most combatants will earn less than $2,000 a year in the ring.The recent match between Yekini and Balla Gaye 2 was an example of one of the rare high-profile and high paying matches. Sources told the New York Times that each combatant received about $300,000 for the match. Yekini was defeated after two minutes and six seconds, his first defeat in over 15 years. Promoters are currently trying to arrange a match between the victor, Balla Gaye 2, and the last wrestler who was able to defeat him, Eumeu Sene.
Amid the fallout from Donald Trump’s impending presidency, Jalen Rose believes many NBA stars will refuse White House visits.The retired basketball player made the proclamation on ESPN’s “NBA Countdown” Nov. 9 ahead of the Cleveland Cavaliers’ visit to the president’s estate.He began by describing how Trump has alienated the Black community and other non-white groups. During his campaign, the Republican president-elect re-tweeted an inaccurate tweet about Black people murdering whites, to name one indiscretion. Such rhetoric led Black Twitter users to flip the script on his flawed logic earlier this month.“How it’s going to affect sports?” Rose said of Trump’s stance. “Unlike Tom Brady – when his team won the championship, and he chose not to go to the White House, saying it was a scheduling conflict when Barack Obama was in office – what we’re going to see in professional sports — NBA and NFL — mark my words. There will be players that decline the opportunity to visit the White House under his presidency.”If Rose’s words are true, that means the Cavs would be the last team to accept recognition from the Oval Office.Members of the Ohio-based team stopped by 1600 Pennsylvania Ave to celebrate their championship during the 2016 NBA season.President Obama praised the team in a speech Nov. 10, especially LeBron James.“When you see LeBron James, it is not just his power and his speed and his verticle,” Obama said. “It is his unselfishness, it is his work ethic, it is his insistence on always making the right play, his determination. All of which make him one of the great players of all time.””Let’s give it up for the world champs one last time!” —@POTUS honors the 2016 NBA Champion Cleveland @Cavs https://t.co/E82ea3Dq5l— The White House (@WhiteHouse) November 10, 2016Additionally, the team took part in the Mannequin Challenge with first lady Michelle Obama. The craze involves participants standing perfectly still as they interact with one another on video.Freezing our @WhiteHouse visit in time forever with @FLOTUS!#MannequinChallenge ?? pic.twitter.com/iX1qaJ8qQQ— Cleveland Cavaliers (@cavs) November 11, 2016
DENVER — Kawhi Leonard is indispensable to the San Antonio Spurs — or at least that’s how he’s now perceived. His mysterious injury not only threatens to snap the Spurs’ two-decade-long playoff streak, but there’s a chance it could also derail the club’s future by driving Leonard away.If there’s an irony in how monumentally important Leonard is to the Spurs’ chances now, though, it’s that he was still relatively anonymous to the casual basketball fan just four years ago, despite performing at a fairly high level on one of the league’s best teams at that time. It wasn’t until June 2014, when Leonard earned NBA Finals MVP honors, that he began drawing broader attention en route to becoming a bona fide star, one whose health could shift the tenor of a conference finals series.Now, another player — Nuggets shooting guard Gary Harris — quietly appears to be on a similar trajectory. From afar, nothing Harris does seems truly spectacular. But zoom in just a little, watch a handful of Denver’s games, and you’ll see elements of Harris’s consistent, well-rounded skill set start to stand out. Just the way Leonard’s once did.“When I got here, there were questions about whether Gary Harris was an NBA player,” Nuggets coach Michael Malone told me, a reference to Harris’s rookie season, in which he shot just over 30 percent from the field.1While part of that poor performance was due to his over-reliance on threes, Harris was one of just three rookies since 1960 to have shot that poorly on 200 attempts or more. The thought seems comical now, as Harris is serving as both Denver’s best on-ball defender and its leading scorer.For a while, Harris was far stronger on the defensive side of the ball, where it’s harder for the average fan to notice excellence. A solid scorer, by contrast, handles the ball more and gets his name called while the camera pans to his face every time he finds the bottom of the basket. Forcing a missed shot or denying your man the ball on the other end, however, usually isn’t enough to garner that same attention. So that may partially explain why the 23-year-old Harris flies under the radar.At 6 foot 4, he doesn’t force teams to alter entire offensive schemes the way that the 6-foot-7 Leonard, a two-time Defensive Player of the Year, can. Yet Harris constantly seems to find ways to disrupt the league’s best wing players.Harris ranks ninth in the NBA in deflections per game — the same ranking Leonard held last season — hounding volume scorers as they come around screens and illustrating nearly perfect timing as he swats down directly on the ball just as a player is lifting up to launch his shot attempt. Harris’s quick hands and defensive persistence are pretty much the only things that prevent the Nuggets, who surrender more layups than anyone except Orlando, from having the worst defense in basketball. With Harris on the court, Denver surrenders 107.4 points per 100 possessions, which would tie for 20th among the league’s 30 teams. With Harris on the bench, the Nuggets allow 110.6 points per 100 possessions, a rate that would tie for dead last.It’s incredibly difficult to draw the types of defensive assignments that Harris typically gets without committing a lot of fouls. But just like Leonard did in his fourth season, Harris has collected more steals than fouls so far this year, a feat that only elite defensive shooting guards and small forwards generally manage.Harris could be named an All-NBA defender in the coming years without changing much about his game. But to achieve true stardom, he will likely need two things: More scoring — he’s still pretty limited in creating looks for himself — and more wins for the Nuggets.“If we make the playoffs, a lot more people are going to see and know who the hell Gary Harris is,” said Malone, whose team is locked in a crowded playoff race. “It’s funny: Last year, Nikola Jokic wasn’t going to be a part of All-Star Weekend. Then he puts up 40 points at Madison Square Garden and gets a phone call from the NBA the very next day. ‘Hey, we want you to be part of All-Star Weekend!’ So, we know Nikola and how special he is. And I think the same is true of Gary.”Harris has shown true scoring progress every year since his dismal rookie campaign. The former Michigan State star has gone from 3, to 12, to 15 and now 18 points per game; he has become one of the league’s best offensive threats in transition; and he’s on track to shoot 40 percent from the 3-point line for a second straight year. He moves incredibly well without the ball and has perhaps the team’s best on-court chemistry with Jokic, the face of the Nuggets and one of the league’s most skilled young big men.2Through Monday night’s games, Harris was logging a ridiculous 64.3 effective field-goal percentage off Jokic’s passes, according Second Spectrum and NBA Advanced Stats — a rate that’s on par with the most efficient scorers in the NBA. Similarly, Jokic posts a 62.1 effective field-goal rate off Harris’s passes, a figure that narrowly outpaces that Stephen Curry’s overall rate.Harris’s development on offense bears similarities to Leonard’s rise. Through their first four seasons, their numbers looked identical — 12.2 points and 2.1 assists on 47 percent shooting and 37 percent from 3 for Harris3Harris’s fourth year is still ongoing; 12.3 points and 1.8 assists on 50 percent shooting overall and 37 percent from 3 for Leonard.Perhaps even more important: The two men play with an unusually quiet, workmanlike approach, and they are among the most consistent players in the NBA on a night-to-night basis. “He just puts his head down and goes about his business. He doesn’t talk about it much — he just goes out and does it, and we’re fine with that,” says Denver guard Will Barton, whose locker is next to Harris’s. (Harris’s noticeably quiet disposition, along with the Nuggets’ struggles to really break through on TV with local fans,4During the ride to the arena in Denver, my Uber driver, a self-described huge NBA fan, admitted he didn’t know who Harris was. undoubtedly contributes to why Harris isn’t better known around the league yet.)In Harris’s case, one could argue that his consistency on both ends has him on the cusp of joining the elite. Using effective field-goal percentage, a stat that accounts for 3-pointers by looking at the number of points generated per field-goal attempt rather than just shots made per attempt, the chart below illustrates how often the league’s starting shooting guards and small forwards have good shooting nights compared to bad ones. Unsurprisingly, Kevin Durant and LeBron James are at the very top of that list. Leonard rates fifth. And right behind him is Harris at No. 6. Of course, none of this is to say that Harris will continue ascending the way Leonard has during his fifth and sixth seasons, when he went from scoring 16.5 points a contest to 25.5 points while managing to become more efficient despite a heavier offensive load. Without Harris becoming more of a one-on-one threat, which Kawhi has become stellar at in relatively short order, it’s more sensible to compare his offense to Golden State’s Klay Thompson or Washington’s Otto Porter, who play better off the ball than with it.Should Harris develop a more aggressive brand of offense, though, there’s reason to think he could find success with it. While he’s not built like Leonard — one of the NBA’s strongest players, and just one of four NBA wing players last season to record more and-1s than he had shots blocked — Harris is far stronger than he looks and doesn’t shy away from contact. The former All-American high school football player is one of three guards, after James and Philadelphia’s Ben Simmons, who shoots 70 percent at the rim — elite company for strength around the basket.Malone said Harris has been diligent every summer about taking direction from coaches and staff each offseason to continue improving. But Harris told me it was simpler than that for him. “Really, I just want go out there to play and have fun,” he said. “It’s not about me going out and saying, ‘I’ve got to go out and be better than I was last year.’ If you put in the work, it’s going to show itself.”And if Harris continues to improve and show his work to this extent, it may be only a matter of time until just about every basketball fan knows who he is.Senior writer Neil Paine contributed to research for this story.Check out our latest NBA predictions.
Check out FiveThirtyEight’s March Madness predictions. The shading shows you the general range of strengths for each seed.Although not a huge effect, the gap between the No. 5 and 6 seeds and their competition has been narrowing over time. The average difference between No. 5 and 12 seeds from 2000 to 2002 was about 7.6 points, but it has been about 5.8 from 2012 to 2014.More importantly, the 5 vs. 12 matchup looks a lot more like the 6 vs. 11 one than it does the 4 vs. 13. The No. 5 seeds have been considerably weaker than No. 4 seeds, and No. 12 seeds have been considerably stronger than No. 13 seeds. The average No. 5 seed had a 6.6 point expected advantage going into a game against its No. 12 seed opponent. That’s only 2.2 points higher than the average advantage that No. 6 seeds held against No. 11 seeds (4.4 points), but it’s 5.1 points lower than the average advantage that No. 4 seeds held against No. 13 seeds (11.7 points).It seems like the 5 vs. 12 seed matchup is the threshold where the games should start being much more competitive. Combine that with the psychological effect of thinking five is a number that has more in common with four than six (blame our five fingers), and you have a recipe for “shocking” upsets.That is, there are a number of upsets, but we shouldn’t really be shocked. Even just looking at recent history, No. 5 seeds have only been a greater than 10 point SRS favorite in eight round-of-64 games since 2005, and they won 7 of them.3The loser was Illinois against Western Kentucky in 2009. The No. 5 seed has been an SRS underdog three times (and lost twice). Still, the No. 5 seed has performed below what one would expect based on the difference between them and their opponents. But so have most seeds. Here’s a chart comparing the average expected outcomes based on SRS difference and average actual outcomes for each seed over the past 12 years:From this angle, the No. 5 seed “outlier” doesn’t look as impressive. Seeds No. 1 through 6 all underperformed expectations by a smallish — but somewhat consistent — amount. The main difference with the No. 5 seed is that it didn’t have a big enough advantage to underperform this much without losing a lot more games.In other words, if there’s something that has systematically led tournament favorites to underperform their expectations by a few points or so across the board,4As a strictly mathy thing, having a somewhat constant deviation isn’t as weird as it may seem because the standard deviation for a team’s actual SRS is similarly stable. So in this case, it’s a bit like the stronger teams are all running one standard deviation below the expected mean. No. 5 seeds would be disproportionately hard-hit. Thus the 5-seed jinx may be more like the proverbial “canary in a coal mine,” indicating that something bigger is going on.We know the Big Dance is exciting, but could there really be something about the tournament that makes favorites underperform and gives underdogs better-than-normal chances?It’s tricky. For example, the selection committee may systematically overvalue particular types/classes of teams, but that doesn’t necessarily explain why teams would underperform relative to SRS. Some of it could be that SRS is poorly calibrated for the types of matchups we see in the tournament (e.g., between larger and smaller conferences that rarely play each other). It could be that favorites are more likely to regress to the mean.5This is always a good candidate, but, interestingly, there is no such effect in the women’s tournament.Or it could just be that this is March Madness, and anything can happen. If there’s one piece of folk wisdom that has emerged over the past decade or so of March Madness, it’s that No. 5 seeds are jinxed. SportsCenter did a whole story on the subject featuring Virginia Commonwealth University. In 2012, VCU was a No. 12 seed that pulled off a “shocking” upset against Wichita State. In 2013, VCU was itself a No. 5 but defied the trend, crushing No. 12 Akron by 46 points to become the only No. 5 seed to win its opening-round (round of 64) game that year. In 2014, VCU’s story came full circle. It again entered the tournament as a No. 5 seed but was upset by unheralded No. 12 seed Stephen F. Austin University. The tournament quirk that was once VCU’s magic was now its curse.Including those VCU games, No. 12 seeds over the past three years have pulled off upsets in eight of 12 round-of-64 matchups, including six of their last eight. It would be extremely easy to dismiss this as a freak occurrence. (I certainly did at first.) But it’s a real phenomenon. And after looking into it, I think it may be indicative of something larger. The 5-seed jinx may be a sign that March Madness — at least on the men’s side — is even madder than we think.But I’ll get there. First, let’s look at the phenomenon. If it seems like No. 12 seeds beat No. 5 seeds more than they should, it’s because they have. Going back to 1995, No. 5 seeds have been upset 33 times in 80 games. Their 59 percent win rate compares unfavorably to the 66 percent win rate of No. 6 seeds. Based on the trend, it would appear that No. 5 seeds should be winning more like 72 percent. Take a look at how far No. 5 seeds deviate in the chart below. The gray region is the standard error on the fit between seed and win percentage when not including the No. 5 seed:So they’re an outlier, but is it significant? Particularly, how unlikely is this to have happened by chance? Let us consult the oracle of binom.dist() — Excel’s handy function that tells you the probability of things happening a certain number of times, given the probability of them happening once. In a fun bit of symmetry, given an expected win rate of 72 percent, the odds of No. 5 seeds losing six of eight, eight of 12, or 33 of 80 are all about the same: Each is a little under 1 percent.10.8 percent, 0.6 percent and 0.7 percent, respectively.Note that it would be unremarkable for this to have happened by chance: One in a hundred-type things happen every day. But, as a committed Bayesian, I have to consult my priors and determine whether the phenomenon of No. 5 seeds’ underperforming is more likely to be a result of chance or other plausible factors.First, let’s look at how strong each seed’s teams have been since 1995. As you go from the 1 vs. 16 matchups down to the 8 vs. 9 ones, the better-seeded teams get worse and the worse-seeded teams get better, making the contests much closer. To see how much so, we can plot each team’s SRS (Simple Rating System, a metric that measures margin of victory adjusted for strength of schedule) prior to the game.2I backed these out myself, so there may be very small differences from what was actually recorded at the time. They’re as prior to each team’s round-of-64 match for each year (since 1995).
4Shaquille O’Neal5220251.84+4.7517.3 27Ben Wallace299691.88+3.6212.3 9Rasheed Wallace4816271.97+3.6369.6 28Patrick Ewing197031.76+6.1209.9 30Shawn Kemp144892.09+7.3195.9 7Richard Hamilton3514442.01+4.7402.7 8Hakeem Olajuwon229311.59+10.4382.9 6Scottie Pippen5220071.75+3.7420.1 20Terry Porter227881.66+7.0242.3 12Dwyane Wade3714502.02+3.2316.7 1LeBron James3716082.12+9.4790.2 The first two rounds of the NBA playoffs were relatively shaky for the Atlanta Hawks. After winning 60 games and posting a +4.8 Simple Rating System (SRS) score during the regular season, the Hawks have played at only a +2.7 SRS level in the playoffs,1Even after weighting performances in big games more heavily. having been taken to six games by both the Washington Wizards (+0.2 regular-season SRS) and Brooklyn Nets (-3.1) despite holding home-court advantage in each series.And now the real test begins: Atlanta’s first Eastern Conference finals berth ever.2The franchise went to 12 division finals — the precursor to the conference finals — before the NBA split into conferences in 1970-71 but hasn’t advanced this far in the playoffs since. Waiting for the Hawks are the Cleveland Cavaliers, the second-biggest overachievers of the playoffs thus far, according to SRS. Despite the Hawks’ home-court edge, our power ratings set the Cavaliers’ odds of winning the series at 63 percent, and the Vegas sportsbooks concur, setting Cleveland as roughly 67 percent favorites in the series.Much of the difference in talent between the two teams boils down to one simple fact: The Cavaliers have LeBron James, and the Hawks do not. According to the latest update of ESPN’s Real Plus-Minus ratings,3Specifically, the short-term version supplied to us by Jeremias Engelmann. James has inched past Stephen Curry as the most effective player in the NBA right now.But maybe the math is even simpler than that.At the most elemental level of analysis, a James-led team hasn’t lost before the NBA Finals since 2010. James has won five conference finals in six tries. And, most notably, he is arguably the best conference finals performer the league has seen since 1985 (the first year for which Basketball-Reference.com has complete playoff game logs and — coincidentally — Michael Jordan’s rookie season). James has been mostly stellar in every round of the playoffs, but in this particular stage, the only peer James has is Jordan himself.This is apparent using the single-game version of Daniel Myers’s Box Plus/Minus (BPM), which is one of (if not the) best box-score metrics4A little background on the link: BPM was known as ASPM, or Advanced Statistical Plus/Minus, when I backtested it in 2013. available to the public because of its ability to predict team performance in pseudo out-of-sample tests. Using BPM, with adjustments for the level of competition faced, home-court advantage and the leverage of each game, we can measure how many points above replacement were contributed by every player to appear in each round since 1985.And here’s a closer look at just the conference finals, where James has shined his brightest: 5Tim Duncan4516831.57+6.0438.1 11Reggie Miller3914331.97+3.4319.5 13Magic Johnson3112311.61+5.2299.7 15John Stockton289971.60+6.0265.0 16Byron Scott4513271.63+3.6252.4 19Chauncey Billups4115992.02+1.7245.5 3Kobe Bryant4518221.84+6.5590.6 21Manu Ginobili3710711.65+4.6242.2 18Karl Malone3414171.62+3.3250.1 25Robert Horry4713781.70+2.5219.9 James and Jordan, separated by a mere 0.1 units of leverage-adjusted points above replacement, are probably interchangeable picks for the No. 1 conference finals players in that span.Jordan was marginally more effective on a per-minute basis, although James has played more crucial minutes from the perspective of championship probability added. James has shot more efficiently, rebounded with greater frequency and blocked more shots; Jordan was the superior passer and ballhandler (while taking on a slightly greater offensive role) and recorded more steals. James’s teams have played better offensively; Jordan’s were better on defense. The choice might be more a matter of preference in playing style than anything else.But beyond those two, few have any legitimate claim to the modern conference final crown. Only Hakeem Olajuwon, whose +10.4 leverage-weighted BPM was higher than either His Airness or The King, might have a serious case. Yet Olajuwon also played fewer than half as many minutes as Jordan in his conference finals career, a gap that widens still when leverage is accounted for.That’s why, when it comes to accumulating big performances in crucial conference final games over the course of many seasons, Jordan and James tower over the rest. And unfortunately for Atlanta, the latter is a force with which the Hawks will have to reckon if they want to advance to the NBA Finals. 22James Worthy3111881.60+3.9233.6 10Isiah Thomas3011631.86+5.3326.0 23Jeff Hornacek3211441.59+4.0226.3 14Larry Bird229351.62+7.2285.8 26Kevin Durant177171.87+5.7213.8 2Michael Jordan4518681.71+9.8790.1 PLAYERGMPAVERAGE LEVERAGEBPMLEVERAGED PTS ABOVE REPLACEMENT 29Kevin McHale228811.58+5.1204.3 17Clyde Drexler3012001.73+3.8250.3 24Ray Allen3913462.02+1.9222.2
In the wake of American Pharoah’s stunning wire-to-wire Triple Crown-clinching victory at the Belmont Stakes on Saturday, I compared him to Secretariat, finding that — despite having one of the finest Triple Crown campaigns ever — American Pharoah still likely would have finished the Belmont well behind his great-great-great-grandfather. Some readers seem to think this was a cheap shot at the slump-busting champion, although you’d think being called second-best to a mutant horse sent from the future would be considered high praise.Secretariat’s 2:24 Belmont time is safe; no other horse has run under 2:26 (even that is about 10 lengths behind Secretariat). Oh, and he still owns the Kentucky Derby and Preakness Stakes records by two to three lengths each. It has been over four decades, and great horses still can’t come close.But what do we make of this? How is it that even the best horse this era has to offer — with a stride so smooth that it borders on poetic — would still finish 13 lengths behind Big Red?Clearly, it’s that Secretariat is overrated.OK, exhale. I’m not trolling you. I’m just being extremely nitty about the marginal shades of “really, really great.” By “overrated,” I certainly don’t mean to imply that Secretariat isn’t the best 3-year-old American racehorse in history — he is. Or that his Belmont run wasn’t one of the most dazzling moments in sports history (I practically sleep with this footage of it under my pillow). I mean simply that one of the key selling points of his unfathomable greatness is slightly undermined by its broader context. Specifically, that his records — did I mention it has been over 40 years? — have lasted so long in part because the quality of thoroughbred racing has plateaued and perhaps even weakened.To illustrate, I’ve charted all the winning times for Triple Crown races at Pimlico, Churchill Downs and Belmont Park (excluding races that were held at alternative venues) over 9.5, 10 or 12 furlongs (the current distances of the Preakness, Derby and Belmont, respectively).1These distances have been paired with these races since 1926. Each race changed its distance at various points before that (for example, the Derby was 12 furlongs from 1875 to 1895). I’ve marked the trend for the winning times for each distance as of Secretariat’s Triple Crown in 1973 (dashed line) and record progression for each distance (solid line). Winning times for all three distances improved fairly steadily through 1973 but have been trending slightly slower since then:It’s as if God saw the perfect race and thought, “OK, I’m done with horses.”Again, for purposes of parsing different shades of awesome, note that in 1973, for all the drama, Secretariat’s records were pretty garden-variety awesome. That is, they weren’t really far off from where we’d expect the progression of records to have led. Indeed, the gap between his record times and the linear (pre-plateau) trend for winning times was reasonably narrow.Which is to say, Secretariat was no Bob Beamon. Beamon’s 1968 long jump in Mexico City beat the previous long jump record by 0.55 meters — which still accounts for 41 percent of the improvement seen in that event’s entire recorded history (and Beamon’s record still stood for only 22 years). Secretariat’s records have stood for this long not because they were so absurd at the time that we have yet to catch up, but because we stopped catching up.For watchers of human sports, this can be hard to interpret. We’re used to top human athletes getting better and better. This is somewhat concealed in competitive and team sports in which opponents’ skill levels offset each other (making millions of bar arguments over the “Greatest of All Time” more interesting). But evidence of athletic progress is laid bare in virtually any discipline that has objective measures, like speed. Here’s a similar chart for men’s 100-meter to 800-meter race winning times at the Olympics:Only Michael Johnson’s 400-meter Olympic record has been around since before the 2008 Beijing Olympics. The single longest standing world record in any IAAF track-and-field event dates back only to 1983. For some athletic disciplines, the constant improvement over time has been so consistent as to be almost creepy.As to why horse racing hasn’t improved the way human racing has, this old FiveThirtyEight article has a good roundup of speculation — including small population size and lack of genetic diversity. The elite genes in the racing gene pool may be drifting overseas, and, in general, thoroughbred racing’s center of gravity may be shifting.All of that serves as a reminder that although we often celebrate horses as athletes, the sport of horse racing isn’t really comparable to human athletics. If it were, a superhorse as super as American Pharoah would be rewriting the record books.
Source: Pro-Football-Reference.com Joe Montana1979-945,3919,50413,106 YARDS ABOVE… Jim Kelly1986-964,7792,8156,295 Dan Marino1983-998,35812,04919,029 Brett Favre1991-1010,1695,81613,971 Tony Romo2006-154,3315,3048,414 Warren Moon1984-006,8232,9478,062 Steve Young1985-994,1499,89011,175 Manning (2nd half)2006-155,0478,18412,456 Peyton Manning1998-159,38016,56024,101 Troy Aikman1989-004,7153,2927,035 Dan Fouts1973-875,6047,33511,280 Manning (odd years)1999-154,1757,64811,002 QUARTERBACKYEARSPASS ATT.AVERAGE QBBACKUP QB Aaron Rodgers2005-154,0477,7919,775 John Elway1983-987,2504,9309,793 Ben Roethlisberger2004-155,4235,9219,426 Carson Palmer2004-155,4433,4968,053 Ken Anderson1971-864,4757,0879,162 Roger Staubach1969-792,9586,2847,187 Manning (even years)1998-145,2058,91313,098 Philip Rivers2004-155,3395,1749,217 Drew Brees2001-158,0859,57216,151 After a month of speculation that began almost immediately after the clock expired in his Denver Broncos’ Super Bowl victory over the Carolina Panthers, Peyton Manning has finally made it official: He’s retiring from football after 17 NFL seasons.You don’t need fancy stats to tell you that Manning is one of the greatest quarterbacks in NFL history, if not the greatest. (Granted, we’ve used statistics to describe Manning’s impact a number of times over the years.) But they do help us put his accomplishments in perspective. Much like Jerry Rice, consensus G.O.A.T. among wide receivers, there are two (!) Hall of Fame careers lurking inside Manning’s résumé, according to a variant of Chase Stuart’s all-time QB ranking algorithm:1Setting each passer’s adjusted yards against the replacement level of a backup QB, the same baseline used by Football Outsiders in their Yards Above Replacement metric. Manning (1st half)1998-054,3338,37611,645 Terry Bradshaw1970-833,9012,1124,465 Peyton Manning’s had two Hall of Fame careers Tom Brady2000-157,79212,32718,245 Whether you break Manning’s career into two parts chronologically or based on even- and odd-numbered seasons, each half is of essentially the same quality as a Hall of Fame QB — like, say, Dan Fouts or Steve Young — by itself. Manning had more opportunities to throw the ball than just about anyone, ever, so he’s had an advantage in piling up value over replacement compared with quarterbacks of previous eras. But he also helped shape the NFL into the pass-heavy game it’s become, serving as the ultimate archetype of a modern field general.The end of Manning’s career was ugly — both statistically and in terms of off-field allegations — even if he did cap it off with a Super Bowl title. But in terms of his on-field performance, few QBs could match even half of what Manning accomplished over his storied career.
LOS ANGELES – It only took an exceptionally bad basketball half to end an 11-game winning streak and Ohio State’s season. With its dreams of returning to the Final Four left to fester in the Los Angeles sun, the No. 2-seeded Buckeyes watched their NCAA Tournament run collapse as Wichita State toppled them, 70-66, at the Staples Center Saturday evening. The No. 9-seeded Shockers jumped OSU early, laying the foundation for a 20-point lead that would force coach Thad Matta’s squad to play from behind for nearly 34 of 40 minutes of play. In a dizzyingly woeful outing, OSU shot 31 percent and, more miserably, connected on just 5 of 25 tries from 3-point range in its first loss since Feb. 17. “I thought we had some pretty good looks – they just weren’t going down for us,” Matta said in a somber Buckeye locker room following the game. “It’s been a great season for this basketball team. It never ends the way you want it to, but I love the fact of what this team was able to accomplish in terms of sitting at 18-7 (on Feb. 17) and finishing 29-8. They hit their stride at the right time.” But against Wichita State, OSU finally stumbled. Deshaun Thomas led the Buckeyes with 23 points but struggled mightily to do so. The junior forward made just eight of 20 attempts in addition to missing all six of his shots from behind the arc. Sophomore forward LaQuinton Ross added 19 points, but he too found a well-glued Wichita State defense to be problematic. So did the rest of OSU. “Those are shots you have to make – that we’ve been making in this tournament, that we’ve been making in the Big Ten. Guys had good looks,” Matta said. “Unfortunately, they didn’t go down. And a lot of times that becomes contagious. A guy hits one, another guy hits one, things kind of pick for you. It just didn’t happen tonight.” In a first-half performance worthy of elimination, the Buckeyes clanked and clunked their way to 24 percent shooting and found themselves down by as many as 13. Namely, Thomas, a beacon of scoring consistency for OSU, found it difficult to connect on much of anything early. The Big Ten’s leading scorer mustered nine points on 4 of 13 shooting and 0 for 5 from 3-point range in the first 20 minutes. “(It was) very frustrating, very, very frustrating,” Thomas said. “And, you know, it’s just crazy.” The recent development of scoring accomplices like Ross and junior guard Aaron Craft were missing, too. The two combined for seven points on 2 of 11 shooting in the game’s first act. Also nowhere to be found was the swagger that often comes with a team playing for a chance at venturing back to college basketball’s mecca. On the boards, the Buckeyes (29-8) were outmuscled, 27-17, in the first. Any attempt to puncture the Shockers’ interior defense, headed by senior forward Carl Hall, who finished with six blocks, was rendered futile. Admittedly, OSU players have said they’re at their best when playing in transition. But against Wichita State (30-8), such movement was non-existent in the first period as the Buckeyes failed to score a single point off fast breaks. “The funny thing about it, I looked at the box scores, we didn’t have no fast break points,” Thomas said. “You ain’t got no fast break points, you can’t (get them to turn the ball over) and you’re shooting 24 percent. It’s hard to win in the Elite 8.” They went into the half down, 35-22. Matta said his message in the locker room during intermission was simple. “We talked about it at halftime, let’s just cut (the lead) under 10 in the first four minutes,” he said. “We got off to a not-so-good start in the second half and it got kind of deep.” Deep as in the worst deficit OSU had faced since its lost to Wisconsin in Madison more than a month earlier. The shooting woes continued. So did the inability to attack the basket and – perhaps more importantly – defend its own. Time and again, Wichita State gashed OSU’s interior defense for the type of layups you might see during shootaround before the game. On the other end, Hall defended the rim and refused the advances of Craft, among others. “They played Big Ten defense, that’s what you see in the Big Ten,” Matta said. “It’s a loaded box and what you have to do is be able to knock a couple shots down and get some points in transition. Unfortunately, we couldn’t do either today.” Thomas said the Shockers’ defense reminded him of a particular conference foe. “They packed it real well. They was physical. That was a physical team. They reminded me of a Michigan State a little bit in the Big Ten. They was physical, they had shot blockers. They packed it in, they dared us to shoot the 3,” he said. For most of the contest, it worked. But Behind Ross and Thomas, though, the Buckeyes would rally and cut the hole to eight points with 3:55 to play. “We was down like that against Michigan State in the first half, like 12 or 13 points. When we dug ourselves (in a hole), we came back. And we tried to do that this game,” Thomas said. While the momentum continued and brought fans clad in scarlet and gray to their feet, it would ultimately come to a halt against a Shockers squad that remained posed down the stretch. Sophomore forward Shannon Scott hit a pair of free throws to make it 62-59 with 2:49 remaining, but Wichita State sophomore guard Tekele Cotton answered with a gut-punch 3-pointer to again extend the Shockers’ lead. After a layup by Thomas on the ensuing possession, Shockers freshman guard Fred VanVleet’s jumper would make it 67-61 with a minute to play. While the Buckeyes heaved desperate shots in the game’s final 60 seconds, it was ultimately too little, too late against a Wichita State squad on the cusp of reaching its first Final Four since 1965. In his last game, OSU senior forward Evan Ravenel said had his team put the pieces together Saturday, it might’ve been a different story. “If we played a complete game of basketball today,” he said, “we would definitely would be going out to Atlanta.” Instead, the Buckeyes will travel about 2,250 miles back to Columbus.
Scotland Yard allege Maxwell had amassed a library of instructions “regarding the manufacture of explosive substances, the construction of explosive devices and tactics used by terrorist organisations”. Want the best of The Telegraph direct to your email and WhatsApp? Sign up to our free twice-daily Front Page newsletter and new audio briefings. A serving member of the British armed forces is charged with terrorism offences https://t.co/IkKxw4x3r2 pic.twitter.com/0eUHktv6gt— Metropolitan Police (@metpoliceuk) September 2, 2016 A statement said he had allegedly collected “chemicals and components to be use in the manufacture of explosive substances, the construction of explosive devices” and also faced charges of “manufacturing explosive substances” and “constructing explosive devices”.The Met police allege had created hides “to store explosive substances, explosive devices, components for explosive devices, ammunition, weapons, tools and resources used during the construction of explosive devices and assorted other items linked to the preparation of an act of terrorism”.Maxwell is also charged with getting an image of an adapted Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI) pass card and items of PSNI uniform.He has yet to enter a plea and was remanded into police custody at Westminster Magistrates’ Court. The case was adjourned until September 5. A serving Royal Marine has been charged with bomb-making and building secret caches for arms and explosives in England and Northern Ireland.Ciaran Maxwell, serving with Taunton-based 40 Commando, faces charges under the 2006 Terrorism Act for intending to help another commit acts of terrorism.The 30-year-old from Exminster in Devon was arrested last week by counter terrorism police who have since spent days searching sites nearby and in Larne, Co Antrim.
The turnaround issues means an unfortunate delay for our patientsSouth Central Ambulance Service Want the best of The Telegraph direct to your email and WhatsApp? Sign up to our free twice-daily Front Page newsletter and new audio briefings. The crisis in hospitals means that ambulance services are then unable to respond to subsequent 999 calls.Last night Britain’s most senior emergency medicine doctor said departments across the country were “buckling under pressure” with staff “working at the very limits of their abilities”.The first week of January is traditionally one of the busiest periods of they year for the health service, as people seek help for illnesses and injuries picked up during the Christmas period.NHS guidance now states that only patients suffering life-threatening emergencies should be treated in A&E.Doctors at some hospitals have reported on social media that “major incidents” had been declared because of the flood of patients.NHS England did not comment on the claims. A spokesman for South Central Ambulance Service confirmed that 20 of its ambulances had been forced to queue outside Queen Alexandra Hospital in Portsmouth on Monday.“Regrettably the knock-on effect of the demand and the turnaround issues means an unfortunate delay for our patients as we try and handover our patients into the hospital so that we can assist our next patient,” he said.President of the Royal College of Emergency Medicine Taj Hassan said the four-hour target for seeing patients in A&E was “deteriorating at an alarming rate”, adding that performance is now the “worst in over a decade”. Heaving A&E departments are forcing thousands of patients to wait for hours in ambulances outside hospitals as freezing conditions hit the UK.Health chiefs were forced to apologise yesterday after spiraling waiting times in one hospital caused a queue of 20 ambulances unable to offload patients.In London alone, the winter crisis means more than 6,000 patients each week are being left in the back of emergency vehicles because A&E departments are too busy to admit them, new figures reveal.
“We condemn violent and intimidating behaviour and will be investigating what happened. We will be working with the police, campus security and the security team we hired for the event,” they added.“It is a shame that these actions spoiled a day of great sporting conduct and fair play by the Brighton and Sussex teams and many spectators.”Sussex was reported to have won the Varsity cup for the fourth year in a row, winning 12.5 – 8.5. cant believe police shut down sussex campus bc people got bottled at varsity— ✨alby✨ (@blemsquad) March 19, 2017 When Brighton vs Sussex varsity rugby match turns into a full on riot with uni flag burnings, flares and streakers #evwasthestreaker— marf (@marfa_97) March 19, 2017 Charlotte Eaton, a member of the Sussex women’s rugby team, said: “Brighton Uni fans stormed the pitch, so they cancelled the match halfway through. Then the fans were throwing flares at each other and bottles – I nearly got hit by one.”Another spectator said that the lack of stewards present at the fixture had exacerbated the problem, adding: “It became so bad it just spilled over onto the pitch and it all had to be cancelled. Some students were injured, people were lying around with bloody faces. I’ve never seen anything like it.”Another student told the Sussex University online newspaper The Badger: “They easily could have prevented this with better planning. Not to mention, once the match was called off because of fights they could easily have moved people off in smaller groups to make it safer.” A spokesman for Sussex Police said: “Police were called to a report of a large fight that had broken out among spectators at a varsity rugby match at Falmer on Sunday.“Police are examining CCTV of the incident and want to speak to anyone who was injured or who may have witnessed or have information about the incident.” Fights between rival groups of students are believed to have started after Sussex supporters were heard chanting provocative chants towards the Brighton spectators.According to a number of onlookers, the students, described as “posh boys”, chanted “We get AABs, you get STDs”, whilst others shouted “your dad works for my dad”.In response, a number of Brighton students are believed to have responded by burning homemade “Sussex” banners.The string of skirmishes between supporters, described by management from both universities as “shocking and disgraceful”, required police intervention and resulted in a number of nearby bars being closed in an attempt to prevent the violence from escalating.Erupting on Sunday afternoon on Sussex University’s sports complex, the fighting escalated around midday during a rugby varsity match, forcing officials to abandon the contest at half-time.At least two female students are believed to have been injured after being hit by projectiles during the match, which also saw supporters stage a pitch invasion. Want the best of The Telegraph direct to your email and WhatsApp? Sign up to our free twice-daily Front Page newsletter and new audio briefings. Students were seen fighting across various sporting fixtures, forcing officials to abandon the remaining matchesCredit:Twitter Police were forced to intervene as fights flared between rival student supportersCredit:The Tab A university sports day descended into violent clashes between rival supporters on Sunday, as students were seen throwing flares and bottles, burning banners and chanting derogatory songs in front of hundreds of spectators.The clashes between students from the Universities of Sussex and Brighton – who were seen dressed in tribal face paint – resulted in several students being taken to hospital after they were struck with bottles and other projectiles.Amid the violence, one student is believed to have threatened another with a knife, as stewards and police officers struggled to control supporters on either side.Police confirmed that a student was arrested on suspicion of carrying a weapon, and has since been released pending further inquiries. A flare was thrown onto the pitch during a rugby varsity match as police struggled to control supportersCredit:The Tab Sussex Students’ Union said the actions of supporters had been “violent and intimidating” as they warned that those involved may have jeopardised the future of the annual fixture. The incident has forced both universities to launch a formal investigation, with the culprits potentially facing expulsion if caught.Vice-chancellors of Sussex and Brighton, Professors Adam Tickell and Debra Humphries, said they condemned the incident as they warned that the students involved would face “serious consequences”.”The scenes witnessed at the annual varsity sports day were shocking and disgraceful,” they said in a joint statement.“A full investigation has been launched into events and any students identified as having participated in the disorder will face serious consequences under our codes of discipline.“We unreservedly condemn the behaviour. The future of fixtures will be under review as part of our wider investigation.” Nearby, several students were taken to hospital with suspected concussion following a brawl at a football match, whilst the referee and linesmen were hit by objects thrown by supporters.
Want the best of The Telegraph direct to your email and WhatsApp? Sign up to our free twice-daily Front Page newsletter and new audio briefings. A grieving son has been left “disgusted” after his parents’ tranquil graves were ruined by a housing estate Credit:SWNS A grieving son has hit out at a council after it allowed a housing estate to be built just yards from his parents gravestones.Bill Higgins said he “couldn’t believe it” when he visited a cemetery and discovered a row of houses had been built – just one foot from his parents’ graves.Mr Higgings regularly visits the rural cemetery where his dad Morris and mum Irene are buried in the same plot.The 64 year-old even bought a bench so he could sit at the picturesque spot in the village of Waters Upton and look out over the rolling Shropshire hills.But Bill was shocked when he visited his parents’ joint grave before Christmas and saw seven houses being built next to the cemetery at Saint Michael’s church. Bill Higgins is un happy about a new housing estate being built just inches from where his parents, Irene and Morris, were laid to restCredit:SWNS “One of the houses is just a foot from my parents’ plot, if the builders have come any closer with their diggers they might have excavated the grave.”It’s absolutely disgusting, I can’t think of the words to describe it.”Morris was buried at the cemetery after he died, aged 77, in 1977 and his wife Irene was laid to rest in the same plot when she passed away at the same age two decades later.Mr Higgins has asked the authorities to plant bushes to screen the graveyard from the seven new homes.But his pleas fell on deaf ears with Waters Upton Parish Council saying a fence has been planned instead.Developers Days New Homes Ltd said their plans were backed by Telford and Wrekin Council and added that they have made contributions to improve the cemetery.Spokesman Alan Day said: “The scheme is being constructed strictly in accordance with the planning permission granted by Telford and Wrekin Council.”Included within it is an extension to the cemetery itself along with appropriate landscaping provided in consultation with the local parish council.”There will also be the provision of designated safe parking adjacent to the new extension for the sole use of visitors to the cemetery.”Katrina Baker, clerk to Waters Upton Parish Council, added: “We’ve got as part of this development an extension on the cemetery and car parking which has been gratefully accepted by the council and the houses came as part of the deal.”We do understand Bill is concerned. A fence will go up which is being provided by the developer. Mr Higgins added: “When I came to lay flowers on the grave I couldn’t believe it, there was a housing estate basically on top of where my mum and dad are buried. The properties are now almost finished with the boundary wall from one of the homes situated just 12 ins away from Morris and Irene’s joint headstone.Mr Higgins, who lives with his wife Christine, 60, in nearby Wellington, Shrops., said the building site had ruined the peaceful countryside graveyard.The retired mechanical engineer added: “My mum and dad lived in Bristol but my dad was born in Shropshire and said he wanted to come back to retire.”When they came back in the Seventies it was a quiet village and was lovely.”They chose to be buried there because of the lovely views from the cemetery over the Shropshire hills.”I tend to come down here on special occasions like their birthdays and Mother’s Day and Father’s Day and Christmas, and things like that. I enjoy the peace and quiet.” “The reason they haven’t been able to go with a hedge is because of the closeness to the graves.”
For years, the Christmas Day television ratings battle has been more or less a straight contest between the BBC and ITV, with tried-and-tested staples from the Queen’s speech to EastEnders and Strictly dominating the schedules.This year, Channel 4 is to enter the fray, as it pitches the Great British Bake Off against the BBC’s most-watched show last Christmas, Call the Midwife. The Great British Bake Off will be aired on Channel 4 for the first time this festive season, after its shock move from the BBC this year.According to confirmed schedules, it will be broadcast at 7.45pm to 9pm, bringing back old contestants to compete for Christmas-themed challenges.Call the Midwife will air on BBC One from 7.40pm to 9pm.The programme’s scheduled running time has been extended by five minutes in recent days from a previous start time of 7.45pm, giving the BBC a small but important head-start in capturing viewers’ attention. The coveted Boxing Day evening schedule will now be filled by Little Women and The Miniaturist, two novel adaptations and period dramas due for broadcast at 8pm and 9pm respectively.The decision will please lovers of a period drama, avoiding a clash with ITV’s flagship drama Victoria. Boxing Day will see Dame Judi Dench discuss “my passion for trees” on BBC One, while Mary Berry, Sue Perkins and Mel Giedroyc, formerly of GBBO, will reunite for Mary, Mel and Sue’s Big Christmas Thank You. Want the best of The Telegraph direct to your email and WhatsApp? Sign up to our free twice-daily Front Page newsletter and new audio briefings. Call the Midwife Christmas specialCredit:BBC On Boxing Day, BBC One is to screen two period dramas back-to-back, after a last-minute schedule change saw it drop an Agatha Christie drama over rape allegations made against its star.Order By Innocence, starring Ed Westwick, was due to air on Boxing Day, but was removed from schedules after allegations the British actor sexually assaulted women in 2014.The allegations are strenuously denied by Westwick, who said on social media that they were “unverified and provably untrue”, but resulted in a hole in the BBC’s primetime Christmas schedules. The same time slot on ITV will be filled by Paul O’Grady For The Love Of Dogs At Christmas, followed by Coronation Street. Last year, Call the Midwife was the most-watched show on Christmas Day according to overnight figures, with 9.2 million.This year’s GBBO final was watched by 7.3 million people, rising to around 11m once catch-up television was taken into account.If the figures, considered a notable success for Channel 4, are repeated, GBBO could break into the top-ten most watched shows dominated in previous years by BBC One and ITV. The Miniaturist, part of BBC One’s Boxing Day line-up Little Women will air on Boxing Day on BBC One ITV’s Victoria will air at 9pm Elsewhere, the Christmas schedules will see a host of familiar shows, with BBC One following the tried-and-tested formula of recent years from the Strictly Come Dancing Christmas special at 6.30pm to Call the Midwife, EastEnders and Mrs Brown’s Boys.The main slot on December 25, 9pm, will see ITV’s Victoria go head-to-head with EastEnders in a battle partly rendered irrelevant by catch-up television but still close to executives’ hearts.
Stott, a former UK special forces soldier who was partnered with Prince Harry for training, sent his friend regular updates of his journey, and aims to raise £1m for mental health charities.Asked what would have happened if he had not made it back in time to attend the Royal wedding with his wife Alana, he joked: “I’d be divorced”. Prince Harry and Dean Stott meet at Kensington Palace New record: Congratulations to remarkable adventurer @Dean_deanstott who’s just achieved a new record for Fastest time to cycle the Pan-American Highway: 99 days, 12 hours and 56 minutes, raising funds for @heads_together This was the finish line at Prudhoe Bay, Alaska 🚴♂️🌎 pic.twitter.com/mJhFm5w4EL— GuinnessWorldRecords (@GWR) May 12, 2018 Want the best of The Telegraph direct to your email and WhatsApp? Sign up to our free twice-daily Front Page newsletter and new audio briefings. Speaking at the finish line, Stott said: ‘This journey was one of the hardest things I have ever done.”After over two years of training I’m delighted to have not only finished but broken the Guinness World Record.“There were definitely moments where I thought I couldn’t finish but the support has helped me make it to the finish line. Dean StottCredit:Robert Wilson “Thanks to people like Prince Harry and the Heads Together charity partners, mental health is being spoken about much more and I hope by doing this, I have been able to inspire even more people to speak out and get the help they need.“For now, I’m off to put my feet up and spend some time with my wife and two children who I’ve missed incredibly.”Stott’s journey began on February 1 at the southern tip of South America in Ushuaia, Argentina, where he followed the Pan-American Highway to its finishing point in Prudhoe Bay, Alaska. Measuring himself for a morning suit en route, after losing 10kg through his strenuous efforts, Stott will now fly directly back to Heathrow and straight to Windsor for the Royal wedding.“That was my new motivation,” he said, of making the journey so quickly. “I surprised myself really. It’s a bit surreal still.” He also hopes to encourage others to take up exercise to help their mental health.“Physical activity helps so much,” he said. “I’m not saying go and cycle two continents, but maybe go out for a walk.” When Dean Stott, a friend of Prince Harry, embarked on a challenge to cycle the length of South and North America, he set himself 110 days to do it.That was, until he received a certain royal wedding invitation in the post.Instead, Stott this weekend crossed the finish line of his gruelling 13,670 mile trek in Alaska, breaking the world record by 18 days and allowing him to get home to watch Prince Harry get married.The amateur cyclist travelled the Pan American Highway from Argentina to Alaska under his own steam in 99 Days, 12 hours and 56 minutes, far surpassing his own planned record thanks to a combination of fortunate weather conditions, increased fitness and some Royal inspiration.Speaking as he celebrated last night, Stott, who is raising money for mental health campaign Heads Together, said the wedding invitation had arrived at home midway through his journey, with his wife passing on news of the May 19th date. He has so far raised £485,104. 99 days 12 hrs 56 mins, 2 world records and over half a million pounds and counting. Thank you for all your support! @heads_together @pah_2018 #MentalHealthAwarenessWeek @GWR pic.twitter.com/LUhmEgH8R2— Dean Stott (@Dean_deanstott) May 13, 2018
Want the best of The Telegraph direct to your email and WhatsApp? Sign up to our free twice-daily Front Page newsletter and new audio briefings. Drinking full-fat milk could lead to a longer life by protecting against strokes, scientists have suggested. While conventional diet advice has for decades dictated that skimmed and semi-skimmed milk is much healthier for us than full-fat milk, a study suggests that the opposite may be true. Researchers found no significant link between dairy fats and heart disease and stroke, two of the biggest killers associated with a diet high in saturated fat. In fact, certain types of dairy fat might actually help guard against having a severe stroke, researchers reported. It will be welcome news to people who prefer full-fat varieties of milk, butter, cheese and yogurt to those with lower quantities of…
Amanda Spielman, chief inspector at Ofsted Earlier this month, a Public Accounts Committee report warned that Ofsted’s “one day” inspections risk failing to catch out substandard schools.The short inspections have now become “the norm”, but they “inevitably provide less assurance about schools’ effectiveness”, the report said. Ofsted has lost two thirds of its inspectors, figures show, amid complaints that the job has become like a “treadmill”.Since September 2015, 125 out of 175 school inspectors have left, according to data obtained by the Times Education Supplement (TES) magazine.While another 154 have been recruited by Ofsted during the period, a former inspector warned that the “high turnover” of experienced staff is a worrying trend.Mark Williams, who left the inspectorate in 2015, said that the widespread use of shorter inspections made the inspectors’ job into “a treadmill” and was contributing to people leaving.–– ADVERTISEMENT ––“After the shorter inspection came in, the volume of inspections that Ofsted was looking to do meant HMI were expected to do two inspections a week,” he told TES.“You would be planning for a visit on one day, doing the inspection and writing the report and then planning for the next inspection. It became a treadmill of inspection activity.” If a school has previously been graded as “good”, Ofsted subsequently uses a one-day inspection, on average every four years, rather than the full two-day inspection.But since two-thirds of schools are graded as good, the majority of inspections are now carried out in just one day. The National Audit Office from May noted that Ofsted struggled to retain inspectors.It recommended the schools watchdog develops a strategy to stop them leaving in droves, including to take up high paid jobs as executives at multi academy trust (MAT) chains. An Ofsted spokesman said: “It is a marker of the high esteem in which Ofsted is held that we lose a relatively high proportion of staff back to senior positions in MAT chains. Again, this helps with the exchange of experience in the system that can only be to the good.”The education landscape has clearly changed, with wider career opportunities for school leaders and inspectors.“Given this, we encourage senior teachers to see working as an inspector as a potential mid-career role, rather than only something for the end of their career.” Want the best of The Telegraph direct to your email and WhatsApp? Sign up to our free twice-daily Front Page newsletter and new audio briefings.
…US at G20?To most observers, it had to happen sooner rather than later; but none of them thought the dominance of the US in the corridors of world power would be abdicated, rather than dwindle away — as England’s had been after WWI. But at the latest G-20 meeting in Germany, Donald Trump clearly had no inclination to step up to the plate on the dominant issues on the agenda: trade and climate change.On trade matters, with the US pulling out of the mega blocks like TPP — which his predecessor had worked for years to cobble together — China, Europe and Russia rushed in to fill the vacuum with such alacrity you could hear the “whooshing” sound even across the Atlantic. Isolationism might sell in the rust belt of the Midwest, but the other members of G20 were obviously taken aback by the know-nothing obduracy of Trump. Even if America were to get its manufacturing mojo back, does Trump really believe it can afford to neglect the burgeoning markets in the rest of the world?On Climate Change, even the host Angela Merkel had to publicly call out the US for abandoning the Paris Accord, while Macron pointedly proposed that France will host another conclave so that G19 can move on. Trump failed to grasp that the response to “Climate Change” isn’t tied to whether “the science” is right or wrong. It will now lead to the spawning of industries that will eclipse most of the dominant players in the energy field, for one.The US will now indubitably fall further behind in the race for ‘renewables”, where China and India are rubbing their hands with glee. Both those countries have committed to powering their cars in the next three decades with electricity by going the way of Volvo, which just announced it will stop making the internal combustion engine!! Maybe Trump should’ve taken a hint from the company his Secretary of State Tillerson so recently headed – Exxon, which has recently plunged into the production of algae bio-fuels.On a personal level, if one thing epitomised the new power reality, it was a picture of Trump sitting alone at his seat while all around him G20 leaders were locked in animated conversations. Trump didn’t help his cause – or that of the US — when he had his daughter fill in for him at the G20 roundtable while he was engaged in a bi-lateral with Indonesia.Ivanka might be easy on the eyes and a good businesswoman, but she had no official standing to represent the President of the US – especially in such a gathering.While some may enjoy the diminished US presence on the world stage…it could lead to instability.…at CARICOMYour Eyewitness had taken Prezzie at his word when, some time ago, he mentioned on his Public Interest show that he’d be raising the aborted officially designated “Jagdeo Initiative” — which since 2003 had been placed on Caricom’s agenda — to effectuate our Common Agricultural Policy. The Initiative, spearheaded by Jagdeo, has spelled out chapter and verse as to how the 10 constraints that prevented us from feeding ourselves, and even export food, could be overcome.But imagine, this is all Pressie could say on the subject last week: “The Community has the land, the labour, the talent, and the capital to guarantee food security for its citizens. The Community’s annual food import bill, which exceeds US$4B, is a notorious indictment of its ability to promote investment and stimulate intra-regional trade in agricultural commodities.“Non-tariff barriers continue to constrain trade in food. The Community needs to re-examine how it can dismantle the non-tariff barriers to trade in agricultural products while generating employment for its citizens.”“Non-tarriff barriers”? Was it the name “Jagdeo” that stuck in his throat? Sad.…on the oil contractYour Eyewitness knows Trotman will ignore his calls to reveal the details of the deal he’s made with Exxon on OUR oil.But to ignore his coalition partner WPA? Oi vey!! Share this:Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)RelatedEYEWITNESS: Do fuh do…April 4, 2018In “EYEWITNESS”EYEWITNESS: How does it feel…July 18, 2018In “EYEWITNESS”G20: Hamburg sees clashes between police and protestersJuly 6, 2017In “World”
Share this:Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)RelatedNorton donates sports equipment for schools in BataviaMarch 23, 2018In “Sports”Norton takes up responsibility for Culture, Youth and Sport …Henry confirmed as Education MinisterAugust 28, 2017In “latest news”National Cadet Corps officially reintroducedJanuary 19, 2018In “latest news” The Ministry of Social Cohesion through the National Sports Commission today donated boxing gears to the Guyana Prison Service to benefit inmates of the Republican Boxing (prison) gym.(From left) Director of Sports Christopher Jones and Minister of Social Cohesion with responsibility for Culture, Youth and Sports, Dr George Norton, handing over the gear to Gladwin Samuels, Director of Prisons (ag) and Kevin Pilgrim, Georgetown Prison Superintendent.Minister of Social Cohesion with responsibility for Culture, Youth and Sports, Dr George Norton said the donation will benefit sportsmen in the prison system, specifically those into boxing.“We probably have future stars in the system. We have got to use every single individual, every single athlete. We must be able to give them that opportunity to exercise their potential,” Dr Norton said.Acting Director of Prisons, Gladwin Samuels expressed gratitude to the Ministry for the donation, since the prison gym lost all its gear, including a newly installed boxing ring in the Camp Street fire in July of this year.He said due to the destruction of the sport equipment, some of the inmates were unable to attend a recent boxing competition in St. Lucia. However, with the new gear, he is optimistic that the inmates will be able to attend future competitions.Director Samuels noted that because of boxing, several prisoners were able to make their way out of the system through their performances.Some of the gear donated to the Guyana Prison Service Gym“The reality of it is, boxing has contributed to changing the discipline of many of the persons who are in prison. Many of those who were bad, we put them in the ring and after a period of time, the discipline improved significantly. So, this is an area we will be capitalising in 2018,” Samuels highlighted.Director of Sport, Christopher Jones, who was also on hand, commended the prison service for work done and revealed that one of the inmates was previously nominated for a sports award in 2016.Jones said, “With continued support, we will make further donations to the prison service, so we will ensure those prisoners, not because they were incarcerated we will forget about them. There are talents that we harness in the prison service as recognised by the person who was nominated.”Among the items donated were step machines, exercise bikes, punching bags, free weights with bars, exercise benches, boxing head gears, training gloves, push up bars, mouth guards and jockstraps.
An Enmore, East Coast Demerara (ECD) labourer, was on Thursday, intercepted by Police with over 600 grams of cannabis found hidden in his home.The 29-year-old man of Old Iron Squatting Area, Enmore, was arrested at about 14:45h.Inews understands that ranks were at the time acting on information when they swooped down at the house and conducted a search. It was then that the concealed 675 grams of illegal drugs was discovered.The suspect was arrested and is being processed for court. Share this:Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)RelatedKwakwani resident arrested with 1654 grams cannabisDecember 3, 2017In “Crime”Female busted with ganja at Bartica stelling, male implicated also in custodyJuly 14, 2018In “Crime”Another WBD resident nabbed with 10 pounds of cannabisDecember 14, 2018In “Crime”